"And that was when you produced these large photo collages of a realistic scene, one I remember is the lunch at the British Ambassador's residence in Tokyo .
Well I started making collage photographs because I realised you could make a different space, you're putting in time, and they began to be different and you got a different space. I got fascinated by that, actually, and spent a good few months just using, making complex Polaroid photographs, which are far more complex to make than they look.
Oh, I've never thought they were anything other than very complicated.
And what was interesting was, I knew it was a bit like drawing and painting. When you began I didn't know where the edge would be, whereas most people looking through a camera it's the edge that defines everything, so they grew outwards, it was fascinating, and I realised we see that way, we see in bits. And I realised you could even alter perspective, er.
Because each image gives you rather a different perspective?
Yes, each one is a different one. And I began to be interested in perspective which is a fascinating subject, most people thought it was just in nature, practically, whereas it's not of course. But it seemed as though photography confirmed western perspective and so on. But actually that's where it came from, optics, or so I found out later. It wasn't confirming it, that's.."
The part I relate to most for this project is where he speaks about being able to view the space from a different perspective. I had already established that using lots of photographs to depict just one scene allows the viewer to take as much information and detail from that scene as possible, but I hadn't thought about what Hockey says regarding how we view the world "in bits". You can never see the entirety of a room in one look, so combining several different viewpoints reflects photographically what we really do when taking in a scene.
Some examples of Hockney's collage work:
©David Hockney |
©David Hockney |
©David Hockney |
Particularly in the last image, what strikes me is that Hockney hasn't made an effort to produce a perfectly slick panorama - there are large gaps where bits of the scene are missing. However, what is included is just enough to give us an impression of the scene. I find it interesting how he has included a line of images that is solely there to document the equivalent line of footprints. He has also added an image that was probably taken at the same time, but has different aesthetics to the others on the far right hand side, nearly falling out of the frame. This other image acts as something external being added to his memory of the scene. What is similar to my most recent piece is the use of lots of small, regular 6x4" prints to make up the larger scene. I need to consider whether it would be best to continue to use these small prints, so as to highlight the almost home made nature of it, or whether to print larger, maybe 8x10" so as to encompass the most detail possible.
http://www.hockneypictures.com/photos/photos_collages.php
I've just shot 72 frames worth of images of my room at home, which are currently being developed and printed for me. I'll then sticth them to make a prototype, and decide which size prints I will be going for.